Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has full insight into the importance of evidence in all forms of primary and home care and is based on evidence-based knowledge in their approach
- has evidence-based knowledge of primary and home care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to patients and to their relatives
- masters the care of patients in primary care and at home
- has the ability to supervise and guide patients within the primary care service chain
- has the ability to use both audiovisual and digital tools within the primary care service chain
- has knowledge of older people's specific health problems, both in primary care and at home
- has knowledge of children, adolescents and families' specific health problems, both in primary care and at home
- has knowledge of specific health problems in people of working age, both in primary care and at home
- has the knowledge to care for patients in a home environment with an ethical and professional approach
- can apply patient guidance as well as a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
- has a professional mindset to pay attention in primary and home care to all forms and dimensions of poverty and inequality
- can ensure that all people in a healthy environment can realize their potential in dignity and equality

Content

Specialization in primary care
Resuscitation
Advanced home nursing care
Reception service

Qualifications

Education for nurse:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Materials

See Moodle and realization plan

Further information

The language of education is Swedish
Examination tasks can be written in English
Only for degree students