Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can identify different dimensions of mental health and ill health
- can identify the consequences of abuse and dependence for the welfare society
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and social governance in mental and substance abuse care
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care for patients of different ages
- can assess the need for support and guidance for the family
- can identify methods for early intervention and the need for crisis assistance
- is prepared to care for patients of different ages in psychiatric care
- has the ability to make decisions and based on them prioritize the patient's care
can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
- can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment
- can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages

Content

In-depth psychiatric care

Location and time

Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2025, week 2 - 5

Materials

Se Moodle och kursens förverkligande

Teaching methods

Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Demonstrations
Study visits
Experience expert

Employer connections

Experience expert from various areas of psychiatry and care for drug abuse

Exam schedules

Virtual examination deadline week 6

Completion alternatives

Virtual test at Moodle
Self-study tasks

Student workload

27 h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Grade scale for online testing
92 - 100 % = 5
84 - 91 % = 4
76 - 83 % = 3
68 - 75 % = 2
60 - 67 % = 1

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Education for nurse:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Further information

The language of education is Swedish
Examination tasks can be written in English
Only for degree students