Study Guide

Objective

Student:
- can work in different business environments within healthcare
- can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
- can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
- can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

Content

Care assessment
ABCDE evaluation
Telephone counseling
Digital consulting
Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
Ethics
Sustainable Development

Location and time

Autumn 2024 , Vaasa

Materials

Care Assessment:
Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432

Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630

Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974

Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255

Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

Health technology:

Nordens välfärdscenter
https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/

Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/

Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-

Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324

Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658

A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z

Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

Teaching methods

lectures, group discussion and seminar

Exam schedules

Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

Completion alternatives

Seminar and assignment
instruction will be given in Moodle

Student workload

1 ECTS= 27 hours

Content scheduling

Care assessment 1,5 credits - grade from 0-5
Health technology 1,5 credit - grade pass/fail

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

1-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Did not achieve any of the criteria

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Qualifications

VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1