Starting Points for The Public Health Nurse´s Work at Individual, Group and Community LevelLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: HVV22HA01
Credits
2 op
Objective
The student:
- has knowledge of the legislation, the strategies and the health policy programmes that form the basic principles for public health nurses
- is well acquainted with the core values and ethical principles in public health nursing
- knows about the developmental stages of public health nursing
- understands the significance of social analysis as a main principle in health promotion work
- has the skills to support health promotion in a multicultural and changing society based on the needs of various population groups
- can work for sustainable development in public health care work
Content
Starting points for the public health nurse´s work at individual, group and community level
Qualifications
Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Enrollment
03.12.2024 - 28.02.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 04.04.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
2 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
Teachers
- Frida Gädda
- Marie Hjortell
Teacher in charge
Marie Hjortell
Groups
-
UHV22D-VHälsovårdare (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
The student:
- has knowledge of the legislation, the strategies and the health policy programmes that form the basic principles for public health nurses
- is well acquainted with the core values and ethical principles in public health nursing
- knows about the developmental stages of public health nursing
- understands the significance of social analysis as a main principle in health promotion work
- has the skills to support health promotion in a multicultural and changing society based on the needs of various population groups
- can work for sustainable development in public health care work
Content
Starting points for the public health nurse´s work at individual, group and community level
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Qualifications
Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved