Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- has basic knowledge and insights into genetics and knowledge of hereditary diseases, especially the Finnish heritage, and can use the knowledge of their midwifery work
- is familiar with the anatomy of the pelvis and genitals, the physiology of reproduction and pregnancy, endocrinology and fetal development, and understands the importance of these in the midwife's activities

Content

Content of Reproductive Physiology:
Pelvic anatomy
The anatomy of the genitals
Reproductive physiology and endocrinology
Development of the fetus

Content of genetics:
Genetics and molecular biology
Hereditary diseases
The Finnish heritage

Qualifications

VÅ26GV
VÅ26KV
VÅ26PR

VÅ26UV01-UV03

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.