Study Guide

Objective

The learning goals of the study period (course)
After completing this course, the student is expected to:
• have developed and demonstrated their ability to apply the skills and knowledge they have acquired in their professional studies
• reflect, document and report on their developing processes
• present their work in a professional manner
• demonstrate critical and analytical thinking
• demonstrate their professional competence
Prerequisites: A passing grade in all foundational and professional courses
Contents of this study period (course)
Practical and theoretical work on one’s own thesis.

Content

The learning goals of the study period (course)
After completing this course, the student is expected to:
• have developed and demonstrated their ability to apply the skills and knowledge they have acquired in their professional studies
• reflect, document and report on their developing processes
• present their work in a professional manner
• demonstrate critical and analytical thinking
• demonstrate their professional competence
Prerequisites: A passing grade in all foundational and professional courses
Contents of this study period (course)
Practical and theoretical work on one’s own thesis.

Teaching methods

The learning goals of the study period (course)
After completing this course, the student is expected to:
• have developed and demonstrated their ability to apply the skills and knowledge they have acquired in their professional studies
• reflect, document and report on their developing processes
• present their work in a professional manner
• demonstrate critical and analytical thinking
• demonstrate their professional competence
Prerequisites: A passing grade in all foundational and professional courses
Contents of this study period (course)
Practical and theoretical work on one’s own thesis.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment criteria, good (3)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

0 - Fail
The thesis does not meet the basic requirements.
Significant deficiencies in understanding, methodology, and presentation.
Lacks coherence and fails to address the research question adequately.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

1-2 - Satisfactory to Sufficient
1 (Satisfactory): The thesis shows minimal understanding and application of relevant concepts.
Contains several errors and lacks depth in analysis.
Presentation and structure are weak.
2 (Sufficient): The thesis meets the basic requirements but with notable weaknesses.
Some understanding of the topic is evident, but analysis is superficial.
Presentation is acceptable but could be improved.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

3-4 - Good to Very Good
3 (Good): The thesis demonstrates a good understanding of the topic.
Analysis is sound, though not particularly innovative.
Well-structured and clearly presented.
4 (Very Good): The thesis shows a strong grasp of the subject matter.
Analysis is thorough and well-supported by evidence.
Presentation is clear and professional.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 - Excellent
The thesis is of exceptional quality.
Demonstrates original thinking and a deep understanding of the topic.
Analysis is insightful and well-argued.
Presentation is exemplary, with no significant errors.

Qualifications

A passing grade in all foundational and professional courses

Further information

Only for degree students