Study Guide

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
- are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
- are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

Content

Clinical nursing methods
Ergonomics in the work
Aseptic manners
Nursing process

Location and time

Spring 2024
Novia, Alera Vasa.

Practical training at KTC (Clinical training center) 2:ond floor.
Practical training is Compulsory to join.

Check tuudo for your schedule for this course.

Materials

Berman, Audrey & Snyder, Shirlee. (2016). 9th Ed. Kozier & Ern´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and Practice. 9th Ed. Pearsons. - also found as an e-book!

Moodle: Teachers notes

According to teacher's instructions

Teaching methods

Blended learning
Group work
Individual work
Seminars

Exam schedules

First examination for the theoretical part will be on the last scheduled lesson and the date for retakes, look in Moodle

Student workload

3 credits means 3x 27h work for students = 81h

Further information

No prerequisites

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
På engelska.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prerequisites