Mental Health PromotionLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: VÅV14PV01
Credits
3 op
Objective
Student
- has the ability to compare mental health and ill-health from an interdisciplinary perspective
- can identify different perspectives on mental health and ill-health from a national and regional perspective
- can distinguish mental health services taking into account the special needs of man of different ages
Content
Mental health promotion
Qualifications
Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
Nursing care in general surgery 1
Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
Enrollment
01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024
Timing
22.01.2024 - 28.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Seats
4 - 25
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Anita Ståhl-Levón
- Marlene Gädda
Teacher in charge
Marlene Gädda
Groups
-
USS21F-VSjukskötare (YH), h21, flerform, Vasa
-
USS21D-VSjukskötare (YH), h21, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- has the ability to compare mental health and ill-health from an interdisciplinary perspective
- can identify different perspectives on mental health and ill-health from a national and regional perspective
- can distinguish mental health services taking into account the special needs of man of different ages
Content
Mental health promotion
Location and time
Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2024
Materials
Alfvén, G. 2017. Barn och psykosomatik i teori och klinik. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Handout
Teaching methods
Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Demonstrations
Study visits
Experience expert
Employer connections
Experience expert from various areas of psychiatry and care for drug abuse
Exam schedules
Virtual examination deadline
Completion alternatives
Virtual test at Moodle
Self-study tasks
Student workload
27 h/cr
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
Assessment methods and criteria
Grade scale
92 - 100 % = 5
84 - 91 % = 4
76 - 83 % = 3
68 - 75 % = 2
60 - 67 % = 1
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
For the exam
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
For the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
For the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
Qualifications
Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
Nursing care in general surgery 1
Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 05.02.2023
Timing
06.02.2023 - 31.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Anita Ståhl-Levón
- Viktor Matintupa
- Carita Blomström
- Marlene Gädda
Teacher in charge
Anita Ståhl-Levón
Groups
-
USS20D-VSjukskötare (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- has the ability to compare mental health and ill-health from an interdisciplinary perspective
- can identify different perspectives on mental health and ill-health from a national and regional perspective
- can distinguish mental health services taking into account the special needs of man of different ages
Content
Mental health promotion
Location and time
Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2023
Materials
Alfvén, G. 2017. Barn och psykosomatik i teori och klinik. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Handout
Teaching methods
Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Demonstrations
Study visits
Experience expert
Employer connections
Experience expert from various areas of psychiatry and care for drug abuse
Exam schedules
Virtual examination deadline
Completion alternatives
Virtual test at Moodle
Self-study tasks
Student workload
27 h/cr
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
Assessment methods and criteria
Grade scale
96 - 100 % = 5
91 - 95 % = 4
86 - 90 % = 3
80 - 89 % = 2
75 - 79 % = 1
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
For the exam
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
For the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
For the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
Qualifications
Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
Nursing care in general surgery 1
Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2