Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has insights on issues related to the midwife's history and its impact on midwifery knowledge of today
- is familiar with the ethics and values of the midwife's work
- knows and can use the legislation that governs the midwife's work
- is familiar with the family and women-centered work of midwifery knowledge
- has an understanding of the midwife's role in society and the world
- has the ability to independently acquire new research results within midwifery knowledge
- can work for sustainable development

Content

Midwife's history
Midwife training in Finland today
Midwife's work area
Midwifery ethics
Legislation
Statistics
The role of the midwife in society (Finland, Europe, the world)

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Medical and surgical 1
Medical and surgical 2
Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
Mental health and psychiatry

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)