Budgeting, Strategic Management and Follow-upLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: HCS25DE03
Credits
5 cr
Objective
Student:
- is able to explain and apply legislation regarding social and health care
- understands the economics of social and health care as part of the social economy and the organisation's activities
- is able to describes and apply the basics of budgeting and budget follow-up
- is able to explain the relationship between business and budget
- is able to evaluate and argue competition in public and private social and health care
Content
Social and health care legislation
Social and health care economics
Budgeting
Competition law
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment: The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Enrollment
02.12.2025 - 31.12.2025
Timing
01.01.2026 - 31.07.2026
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Camilla Strandell-Laine
- HYH Hälsa och Välfärd
Teacher in charge
Camilla Strandell-Laine
Groups
-
HCS25F-ÅHealth Care and Social Services, 2025 full-time studies
Objective
Student:
- is able to explain and apply legislation regarding social and health care
- understands the economics of social and health care as part of the social economy and the organisation's activities
- is able to describes and apply the basics of budgeting and budget follow-up
- is able to explain the relationship between business and budget
- is able to evaluate and argue competition in public and private social and health care
Content
Social and health care legislation
Social and health care economics
Budgeting
Competition law
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment: The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Qualifications
No prerequisites