Budgeting, Strategic Management and Follow-upPoäng (5 sp)
Kod: HCS25DE03
Poäng
5 sp
Studieperiodens (kursens) lärandemål
Student:
- is able to explain and apply legislation regarding social and health care
- understands the economics of social and health care as part of the social economy and the organisation's activities
- is able to describes and apply the basics of budgeting and budget follow-up
- is able to explain the relationship between business and budget
- is able to evaluate and argue competition in public and private social and health care
Studieperiodens (kursens) innehåll
Social and health care legislation
Social and health care economics
Budgeting
Competition law
Förkunskapskrav
No prerequisites
Bedömningskriterier, nöjaktig (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment: The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Anmälningstid
02.12.2025 - 31.12.2025
Tajmning
01.01.2026 - 31.07.2026
Antal studiepoäng
5 sp
Prestationssätt
Kontaktundervisning
Ansvarig enhet
Institutionen för hälsa och välfärd
Verksamhetspunkt
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Undervisningsspråk
- Englanti
Utbildning
- Utbildning inom social- och hälsovård
Lärare
- Camilla Strandell-Laine
- HYH Hälsa och Välfärd
Lärare
Camilla Strandell-Laine
Grupper
-
HCS25F-ÅHealth Care and Social Services, 2025 full-time studies
Lärandemål
Student:
- is able to explain and apply legislation regarding social and health care
- understands the economics of social and health care as part of the social economy and the organisation's activities
- is able to describes and apply the basics of budgeting and budget follow-up
- is able to explain the relationship between business and budget
- is able to evaluate and argue competition in public and private social and health care
Innehåll
Social and health care legislation
Social and health care economics
Budgeting
Competition law
Vitsordsskala
H-5
Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment: The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Förkunskapskrav
No prerequisites