Study Guide

Objective

Student:
- is able to explain and apply legislation regarding social and health care
- understands the economics of social and health care as part of the social economy and the organisation's activities
- is able to describes and apply the basics of ​​budgeting and budget follow-up
- is able to explain the relationship between business and budget
- is able to evaluate and argue competition in public and private social and health care

Content

Social and health care legislation
Social and health care economics
Budgeting
Competition law

Location and time

Autumn 2023
Online 100% via Teams

27.10.2023 09.15 - 12.00
24.11.2023 08.15 - 12.00
12.12.2023 08.15 - 12.00

Materials

Lecture material, scientific articles and other distributed material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures, self-studies and assignments

Student workload

The course covers 5 ECTS credits, totalling 135 hours of student work.
Lectures 8 h
Seminars 4 h
Selfstudies 123 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment: The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

In Moodle.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced.
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle.
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good.
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature.
Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions.
Makes versatile use of literature.
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically.

Qualifications

No prerequisites