Skip to main content

Welfare Policy and Societal ImpactLaajuus (5 cr)

Code: SHV16UL02

Credits

5 op

Objective

The student:
Is well acquainted with the content, characteristics and prospects of welfare policy
Can analyse the international and national trends of the international community
Can contribute to further development of the client/patient/user's participation and participation in health and care
Can influence the development of her/his own business area in contact with the environment and with political decision makers

Content

Social and health policy
Welfare policy
Community Development

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments.
The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Materials

According to the lecturer's instructions

Enrollment

15.06.2022 - 27.10.2022

Timing

28.10.2022 - 15.01.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages
  • Svenska
Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
  • Camilla Strandell-Laine
  • Ghita Bodman
Teacher in charge

Camilla Strandell-Laine

Groups
  • SHV21HD-V
    Social- och hälsovård, h21, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
  • SHV21HD-Å
    Social- och hälsovård, h21, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
  • SHV22HD-Å
    Social- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
  • SHV22HD-V
    Social- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa

Objective

The student:
Is well acquainted with the content, characteristics and prospects of welfare policy
Can analyse the international and national trends of the international community
Can contribute to further development of the client/patient/user's participation and participation in health and care
Can influence the development of her/his own business area in contact with the environment and with political decision makers

Content

Social and health policy
Welfare policy
Community Development

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments.
The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

No prerequisites