Developing Radiographic Imaging, Treatments and Procedures in Clinical RadiographyLaajuus (10 cr)
Code: SHV22RS03
Credits
10 op
Objective
The student:
- is able to develop optimization process of patient dose and image quality in clinical radiography
-is able to describe and apply the principles of justification and optimization of examinations/treatments by their indications, procedures and image quality
- is able to apply international, national and organisation specific best practices
- is able to evaluate and develop factors associated to image quality and patient dose
- is s able to develop expertise in dose optimization
Content
Part a 5 ECTS: Survey of existing situation
Part b 5 ECTS: Developing practices and evaluation of the development
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Materials
According to the lecturer's instructions
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022
Timing
01.01.2023 - 31.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
10 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Katarina Vironen
Teacher in charge
Katarina Vironen
Groups
-
SHV22HD-ÅSocial- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
-
SHV22HD-VSocial- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
Objective
The student:
- is able to develop optimization process of patient dose and image quality in clinical radiography
-is able to describe and apply the principles of justification and optimization of examinations/treatments by their indications, procedures and image quality
- is able to apply international, national and organisation specific best practices
- is able to evaluate and develop factors associated to image quality and patient dose
- is s able to develop expertise in dose optimization
Content
Part a 5 ECTS: Survey of existing situation
Part b 5 ECTS: Developing practices and evaluation of the development
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Qualifications
No prerequisites