Studieguide

Lärandemål

The student
- obtains insights into the profession of a biomedical laboratory scientistThe student:
- is familiar with the own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
- reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
- can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
- is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking

Innehåll

Information about studying at Novia UAS and information retrieval
Learning in an academic context
Data protection and data security
Communication skills
Information about studying at Novia UAS and information retrieval
Learning in an academic context and study technique
Data protection and data security
Communication skills
Scientific writing and literature search both manually and in databases
Reliable source material and source criticism
Oral and written presentation
Email management and the use of social media in biomedical laboratory science
Information about
Peppi, Moodle, Curriculum, Degree Regulations
DP in Biomedical Laboratory Science
Student Union

Tid och plats

Alere, Novia + online
Beginning of the semester 2023

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

intra.novia.fi
Degree regulations in Novia UAS
Peppi
Novia UAS's writing instructions

Undervisningsmetoder

Information and orientation about studies in Novia UAS
Online assignments
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Compulsory attendance
-oral presentation (video recorded)
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Pass/Fail

Förkunskapskrav

None