Clinical physics and radiation biology (4 cr)
Code: RAD22ST02-3001
General information
Enrollment
15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022
Timing
26.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
4 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy
Teachers
- Anders Skjäl
- Katarina Vironen
Teacher in charge
Katarina Vironen
Groups
-
URS22D-VRöntgenskötare (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
The Student:
- has basic understanding in electricity and good insight into radiation in order to apply knowledge in future courses using different types of methods and thus different types of radiation
- understands the interaction of radiation with matter, has insight into the effects of radiation on humans and the radiation sensitivity of different organs and tissues
Content
Basic physics
Radiation biology
Location and time
According to the schedule
Radiation physics Anders Skjäl
Radiation biology Katarina Vironen
Teaching methods
Föreläsningar, workshop
Completion alternatives
Written exam
Student workload
Radiation physics 27h x= 54h
Radiation biology 27h x= 54h
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)