Study Guide

Objective

Student
- mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
- can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
- can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
- has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
- mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
- mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
- has knowledge of couple relationships, parenting and early interaction

Content

Antenatal care

Location and time

Alere March-May 2023.

Materials

Paananen m.fl. (2021). Kätilötyö. Edita.
Lindgren et al (2022). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentliteratur.
Berg, M. & Lundgren, I. (2010). Att stöda och stärka - vårdande vid barnafödande. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T.( red.) (2015). Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Institutet för hälsa och välfärd, Helsingfors.
NEUKO-database
Tuomi J (red), Viisaat valinnat, hedelmällisyyden suojelu. Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulu.
Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

Teaching methods

Lectures, cases, discussions, self-studies.
Practical skills training + film

Completion alternatives

Clinical training (and filming) and active participation in the course.
Written exam.
Individual assignment.

Student workload

27 h/cr

Further information

Course introduction and clinical training are compulsory
Attendance and active participation in all lessons is recommended.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved clinical training by filming
Passed exam
Individual assignments

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Medical and surgical 1
Medical and surgical 2
Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
Mental health and psychiatry