Change Leadership (5 cr)
Code: HCS21EB01-3001
General information
Enrollment
15.11.2021 - 11.01.2022
Timing
11.01.2022 - 31.03.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Marica Hinders
- Camilla Strandell-Laine
Teacher in charge
Marica Hinders
Groups
-
SHV21HD-VSocial- och hälsovård, h21, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
-
HCS21F-ÅHealth Care and Social Services, 2021 full-time studies
-
SHV21HD-ÅSocial- och hälsovård, h21, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
-
HCS21P-ÅHealth Care and Social Services, 2021 part-time studies
Objective
After completing the course, the student is able to:
-Recognize and analyze the development of leadership studies in modern organizations, with an emphasis on healthcare organizations.
- Explain and interpret change actions in workplaces that are both inclusive and empowering for all participants
- Identify and describe forces of organizational change and how these can be actively worked with in order to promote innovation and entrepreneurship
Content
- Change leadership theories
- Strategic leadership
- Evaluation Practice
Location and time
11.1 15-17
8.2 15-17
16.2 9-16 Conference Nordic Healthcare 2022
2.3
Materials
To be introduced during the introductory lecture.
Teaching methods
Online lectures and seminars.
Exam schedules
To be introduced during the introductory lecture.
Student workload
10 ECTS credits equals a total of approximately 270 hours of work.
1 ECTS credit = 27 hours work.
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the written exam
The student can explain the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar
Qualifications
No prerequisites