Skip to main content

Change Leadership (5 cr)

Code: HCS21EB01-3001

General information


Enrollment

15.11.2021 - 11.01.2022

Timing

11.01.2022 - 31.03.2022

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Virtual portion

5 op

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages

  • English

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

Teachers

  • Marica Hinders
  • Camilla Strandell-Laine

Teacher in charge

Marica Hinders

Groups

  • SHV21HD-V
    Social- och hälsovård, h21, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
  • HCS21F-Å
    Health Care and Social Services, 2021 full-time studies
  • SHV21HD-Å
    Social- och hälsovård, h21, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
  • HCS21P-Å
    Health Care and Social Services, 2021 part-time studies

Objective

After completing the course, the student is able to:
-Recognize and analyze the development of leadership studies in modern organizations, with an emphasis on healthcare organizations.
- Explain and interpret change actions in workplaces that are both inclusive and empowering for all participants
- Identify and describe forces of organizational change and how these can be actively worked with in order to promote innovation and entrepreneurship

Content

- Change leadership theories
- Strategic leadership
- Evaluation Practice

Location and time

11.1 15-17
8.2 15-17
16.2 9-16 Conference Nordic Healthcare 2022
2.3

Materials

To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

Teaching methods

Online lectures and seminars.

Exam schedules

To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

Student workload

10 ECTS credits equals a total of approximately 270 hours of work.
1 ECTS credit = 27 hours work.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the written exam
The student can explain the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar

Qualifications

No prerequisites