Irén Vikström-Dahl
National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
Tabloski, P. 2014. Gerontological nursing
Craig, L. 2019, The role of the registered nurse in supporting frailty in care homes. British Journal of Nursing 7/11. 2019
Ferraro, K., Janet M. Wilmoth, J. 2013 Gerontology : Perspectives and Issues, Fourth Edition
Sugar, J.A 2019. Introduction to aging. A positive interdisciplinary approach
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment
National and international recommendations on Moodle
Powerpoint presentations
Movies
Lectures online and in class
Groupwork
Group work geriatrics: pass/fail
On line exam: grade 1-5
Written assignment rehabilitation: grade 1-5
Not participating in seminar: the student writes a summary and gives comment on the other groups presentation
English
08.11.2021 - 19.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Camilla Mattjus
Information about the course will be given the first lecture. At the same time also information about literature and search strategy i library and on database..
Students are divided into smaller groups by the teacher and students work in the same group throughout the course
Deadlines are to be followed
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
3.00 credits
H-5
NU21AF14 - 3002, is realized completely online week 45-50
Open path students
Written assignments and group report submitted (Rehabilitation and geriatrics)
Online exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar obligatory (Rehabilitation)
Retake: dates on Moodle
Autumn 2021 week 45-50
5 x 27 h = 135 h
The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar