•   The professional paradigm of a Nurse practitioner SHV18AK01-3004 21.01.2022-31.05.2022  5 credits  (SHV21HD-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student
    Can map and develop a professional paradigm as an advanced clinical nurse
    Have readiness to critically analyse and evaluate advanced communication skills with patients/clients and employees
    Can apply models for the reflection that shows complex overall needs of patients, family and environment in order to be able to practice the ability for critical analysis and evaluation
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Advanced clinical nursing care
    Critical thinking
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
    The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Rika Levy-Malmberg

    Learning material

    Boman, E., Levy, M. R., & Fagerström, L. (2020). Differences and similarities in scope of practice between registered nurses and nurse specialists in emergency care: an interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 34(2), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12753
    Boman, E., Glasberg, A.-L., Levy-Malmberg, R., & Fagerström, L. (2019). “Thinking outside the box”: advanced geriatric nursing in primary health care in Scandinavia. BMC Nursing, 18(1), N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0350-2
    Boman, E., Levy, M. R., & Fagerström, L. (2019). Nurses’ understanding of becoming nurse practitioner role in the Norwegian emergency care context: A qualitative study. Nordic Journal of Nursing research. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158518783166
    Bryant-Lukosius, D., & DiCenso, A. (2004). A framework for the introduction and evaluation of advanced practice nursing roles. Journal of Advanced Nursing (Wiley-Blackwell), 48(5), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03235.x
    Kerr, L., & Macaskill, A. (2020). The journey from nurse to advanced nurse practitioner: applying concepts of role transitioning. British Journal of Nursing, 29(10), 561–565. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.10.561
    Mackey, H., Noonan, K., Kennedy Sheldon, L., Singer, M., & Turner, T. (2018). Oncology Nurse Practitioner Role: Recommendations from the Oncology Nursing Society’s Nurse Practitioner Summit. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 22(5), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1188/18.CJON.516-522

    Learning methods

    Lectures, group discussion

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    0-5

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    21.01.2022 - 31.05.2022

    Enrollment date range

    15.11.2021 - 21.01.2022

    Group(s)
    • SHV21HD-V
    • SHV21HD-Å
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Rika Levy-Malmberg

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Share of online studies

    2 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    evaluation according to general instruction at Novia from 0-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    written assignment , instruction will be given during the lecture

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2020 campus Vaasa

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 sp = 27 hours

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject
    Assessment criteria for written work:
    The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is
    inadequate. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential
    The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The
    students have followed the instructions for the written work. but has a lack of knowledge in
    the substance concerns the essential

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student is accountable for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
    Assessment criteria for written work:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows partly insufficient knowledge
    regarding the other students' written work
    The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student shows an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
    Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
    Study period