Jessica Emaus
Rekommenderad kurslitteratur
Bergman, S. & Blomqvist, C. (2018). Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Studentlitteratur
Blennberger, E. (2013). Bemötandets etik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Blennberger, E. (2005). Etik i socialpolitik och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
ETENE publikation 33: Den etiska grunden för social- och hälsovården. Hittas här:
https://etene.fi/sv/publikationer
Gray, M. & Webb, S. A. (2010). Ethics and value perspectives in social work. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sandman, L. & Kjellström, S. (2018). Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Studentlitteratur.
Sandström, S. (2008). Makten du har: Att hantera makt i socialt arbete. Gothia.
Talentia. Vardagen, värderingarna och etiken. Etiska riktlinjer för yrkespersonen inom sociala området. Tillgänglig på: https://talentia.lukusali.fi/#/reader/9eaa5714-da82-11ec-b195-00155d64030a
Lectures, literature studies, individual assignments, group discussions
The course and the learning task are assessed according to the scale 0-5
Swedish
01.11.2023 - 31.12.2023
15.06.2023 - 31.10.2023
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Vasa Socionom, Nadja Suomela, Jessica Emaus
Course with a lot of reflection and dialogue.
Degree Programme in Social Services
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Course examination:
- Attendance
- Individual learning task
Attendance requirements: students attend at least 4/5 part-time study sessions (GK/UK)
If the attendance requirement is not met, the student contacts the course manager and agrees on a compensation task.
Individual learning task: Students hand in written work. The learning task is assessed according to the scale 0-5. More detailed instructions regarding the learning task are published on the course's Moodle page. Students receive short written feedback on the learning task in connection with the submitted work on the Moodle platform
3 sp = 27h x 3 = 81h
20h lectures
61h self studies
Students have not submitted a learning task within the set time and/or in their task analyzed too superficially and/or incorrectly and/or without anchoring in a relevant source
Students have answered the questions in a relevant way and, with the help of literature studies and/or relevant sources, have been able to make their own applied reflections
Students have answered the questions and demonstrated clarity over central concepts and definitions in the field. The text shows logic in structure and students can also make relevant, reflective parallels. Students have been able to apply the written ethical guidelines and governing documents that are applied within the social sector.
Students show strong clarity and maturity in their understanding. Students can reflect on the phenomena in an in-depth way. Students have shown strong commitment to the text. Students have varied and analytically been able to apply the written ethical guidelines and governing documents that are applied within the social sector.