Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
- has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
- can use caring science as a basis for caring
- According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
- can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
- has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
- has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
- Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

Content

Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

Location and time

Autumn 2022
YH Novia, Vaasa, Alere Campos

Materials

ENDOCRINOLOGIST
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
GASTROINTESTINAL
Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures, self-study, guided questions
SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

Exam schedules

Write test
Test 1:
Re exam 1:
Re exam 2

Completion alternatives

Exam

Student workload

3 sp = 81 h
Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
Test reading:
Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
exam 2 h

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Write test
Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

Qualifications

No prior knowledge