Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
- has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
- can use caring science as a basis for caring
- According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
- can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
- has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
- has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
- can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
- can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

Content

Musculoskeletal disorders

Location and time

See schedule in Peppi

Materials

Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kapitel 14. Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
Kapitel 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.

Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
Kapitel 10. Ortopedi

Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber.
Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
(alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)

Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!

Referenslitteratur:

Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:

Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, and discussions.

Exam schedules

See Peppi and Moodle.

Student workload

27 h/cr.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam: 0-5.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 60%

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 75%.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: points 75% - 90%.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge