Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
- has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
- can use caring science as a basis for caring
- According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
- can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
- can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
- has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
- has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
- has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
- can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
- Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

Content

Urogenital disorders

Location and time

Novia, Vasa Alere.

Våren 2023

Materials

GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
eller
Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.


UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
Föreläsningar på moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Common exam for both parts
The first exam is on the last lecture scheduled 24th of April
Retake exams are on 5th and 26th of May 2023, registration on time is necessary
Deadline for sexuality assignment 20th of April

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions

Student workload

1 cr = 27 h
3 cr = 81 h

Content scheduling

-

Further information

The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
Individual online assignment on sexuality.
Group work on cancer nursing and family planning durign lectures

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Accepted written exam for both parts
Grade 0-5
Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts

38-44 p. = 1
45-52 p. = 2
53-60 p. = 3
61-68 p. = 4
69-75 p. = 5

Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

Qualifications

No prior knowledge