Study Guide

Objective

Student
- have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
- can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

Content

Research methodology
The research process
Qualitative research methods
Quantitative research methods

Location and time

Novia Vasa, Alere.
According to schedule in Peppi.

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self-studies
Assignments

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

Moodle-test in information search
Reflection report and scientific articles assignment
Written exam
According to schedule

Student workload

27 h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1 – 2
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Information search
Reflection report: fail-pass
Scientific articles: fail-pass
Written exam: 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 50%
Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge