Skip to main content

Drug treatment 2 (2 cr)

Code: VÅV22KV06-3001

General information


Enrollment

15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

Timing

28.08.2023 - 01.10.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

2 op

Virtual portion

2 op

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages

  • Svenska

Seats

10 - 50

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Nursing
  • Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
  • Degree Programme in Midwifery

Teachers

  • Sirkku Säätelä

Teacher in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Groups

  • USS22D-V
    Sjukskötare (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa

Objective

The student:
-has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
- has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
- masters advanced drug calculation

Content

Advanced drug treatment
Cytotestatic treatment
Epidural pain relief
Fluid treatment
Blood transfusion
Patient guidance and documentation
Advanced drug calculation

Location and time

Online
Spring 2023

Materials

Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
Films and online material in moodle
Articles and research according to instructions

Teaching methods

Online course
Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
Case and problem solving in workshops
Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

Exam schedules

Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
task according to moodle in specific order
tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

Student workload

27h/ cr
%4 h toal workload

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

Content scheduling

Task / week

Further information

The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
Assignmets pass/ rejected
Undone task =0
Active participation in workshops
one part rejected = course 0

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1