Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
- has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
- is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
- knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
- has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
- can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
- is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
- Can apply mentalfirst aid
- Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
- can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
- has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
- can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
- is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
- is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
- can meet people with special needs

Content

Psychiatric disorders
Substance use disorders and addiction
Special needs and disability

Location and time

Autumn 2023, våren 2024

Materials

Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
Lagstiftning
Aktuell forskning
M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self studies, individually and in group

Exam schedules

On moodle

Completion alternatives

Assignments; selfstudy
Groupwork
Test on moodle

Student workload

27h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

For the exam:
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential

For the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

For the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

For the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prior knowledge