Study Guide

Objective

Student
- understands the importance of leadership in patient care
- can appreciate the work group's resources, prioritize the tasks and the responsibility they bring
- can identify the main principles for planning, organizing and managing operations, and have readiness to lead the work
- can coordinate and be responsible for a continuous care of the patient as a whole
- can account for management principles, the working methods of working life and can work in the work community
- can describe work collective agreements and occupational safety
- can develop and understand the importance of internal and external entrepreneurship
- Understands the importance of change in healthcare and can function responsibly in the event of changes

Content

Nursing leadership

Location and time

Campus Alere Spring 2024

Materials

Arbetskollektivavtal och arbetarskydd:
- Allmänt kommunalt tjänste- och arbetskollektivavtal AKTA
- Työsuojelu - Arbetarskyddsförvaltningsens webbtjänst
- Finlex.fi

+ Recommended literature in Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures
Problem solving
Self studies
Individual work
Groupwork

Completion alternatives

Individual exam

Student workload

1 cr - 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Working collective agreements and labor protection - participation 100 %
0-5 for administration and leadership

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care