Nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders (3 cr)
Code: VÅV18KV15-3011
General information
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023
Timing
02.01.2023 - 22.01.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Virtual portion
2 op
RDI portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
34 % Contact teaching, 66 % Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
Teachers
- Marlene Gädda
Teacher in charge
Marlene Gädda
Groups
-
UBM20D-VBarnmorska (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
-
UHV20D-VHälsovårdare (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
- has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
- can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
- is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
- is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
Content
Substance use disorders
Addiction
Location and time
Spring 2023
Novia Vasa, Alere
Teaching methods
Lectures
Groupwork
Self studies
Study visit?
Completion alternatives
Groupwork - seminare
Assignments; selfstudy
Student workload
27h/cr
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Assessment methods and criteria
According to Novias criteria for written assignment
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
Qualifications
No prior knowledge