Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has evidence-based knowledge of primary care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their relatives
- mastered the care of patients in primary care
- mastered the care of acutely ill children
- shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
- can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
- can, in a simulated situation, be responsible for safe drug treatment
- can apply a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
- can apply patient guidance

Content

Clinical nursing care

Location and time

Novia, University of Applied Science, Alere, Vasa
Spring 2024

Materials

PEDIATRIC CAR
Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.

https://www.terveyskyla.fi/kuntoutumistalo/sv

https://www.vardhandboken.se/arbetssatt-och-ansvar/bemotande-i-vard-och-omsorg/telefonradgivning---ett-personcentrerat-vardmote/telefonradgivning-med-samtalsprocessen-som-metod/

Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red) 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm

Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Lectures
Group work
Individual work
Clinical exercises in laboratory class

Completion alternatives

Active attendance
Approved practical exercises
Written examination in internal medicine care, surgical care and pediatric care

Student workload

27 h/sp

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active attendance at the lessons
Approved practical exercises
Written examination assignment. Grade: scale 1 - 5
Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Surgical care, internal medical care, rehabilitation and pediatric care: exam grades 1-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditiona

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context