Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can identify methods for early intervention and need for emergency assistance
- master family-centered working methods and operating models
- has an insight into early interaction between parents and children
- can assess the need for support and guidance for the family
- can evaluate various therapeutic methods
- can develop their own professional skills

Content

Methods for mental health promotion

Location and time

Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2024
Contact teaching week 4 - 6 and 13 - 22

Materials

Gillberg, C. 2016. Neurpsykiatriska funktionshinder hos barn och ungdomar. Internetmedicin.se
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri av Engström, I.. Liber, Stockholm.
Utvalda delar ur Skhole
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Study
Experience Experts

Employer connections

In connection with the project, students can have contact with various care institutions, organizations and private persons with experience of the problems in the Project family

Exam schedules

Intermediate seminar week
Intermediate seminar week
Final seminar Intermediate seminar week
Deadline for tutorials

Completion alternatives

Tutorial task
The project: The family

Student workload

27h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The following points are considered:
Starting points and goal with scale 1 - 5
Theoretical basis and use of literature with the scale 1 - 5
Process control with scale 1 - 5
Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
Analysis and results report with scale 1 - 5
Presentation with scale 1 - 5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context