Study Guide

Objective

• The students have knowledge of the basics of color theory
• The students know different colors and can describe them to the client
• The students know different color systems and color analysis as a method
• The students have knowledge of the psychological impact of colors
• The students have the ability to create digital color palettes
• The students can analyze and evaluate their own work
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach and working methods that promotes economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption for color theory

Content

Color Theory
Colors and Color Systems
Color Analysis and Color Palettes
Color Psychology
Application of Color Theory

Location and time

23.09.2024-06.11.2024 Campus Alere
Course introduction 2.9.2024 MANDATORY ATTENDANCE

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions.

De Mare, M., ChWilliams Language Services, k., & Esposito, F. (2023). Revolutionise your salon with colour analysis: [discover, create and add value to each client with friendly colours]. Independently published.
Eiseman, L. (2006). More alive with color: Personal colors, personal style. Capital Books.
Gage, J. (2000). Color and meaning: Art, science and symbolism. University of California Press.
Middleton, K. k. (2018). Color theory for the makeup artist: Understanding color and light for beauty and special effects. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
(2023). Color coded confidence: The power of colour - all in one personal color analysis: the 12 seasonal color analysis guide to bring out your natural beauty. Independently published.

Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, mood boards, color systems and team work.

Employer connections

Alumni teacher.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of practical exercises in class, submitted course assignments and exam, deadline in Autumn 2024.

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Group or individual feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 28 hrs
Self study: 53 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.
The grades (0-5) are given for the following parts:
1. Active participation in practical exercises in class (1 cr.)
2. Exam (1 cr.)
3. Course assignment (1 cr.)

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignment is inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites