Communication for Bachelors of Social Services (3 cr)
Code: SOV22SPR01-3007
General information
Enrollment
15.06.2025 - 31.07.2025
Timing
01.09.2025 - 19.10.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Miranda Ekholm
Teacher in charge
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Scheduling groups
- Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 3 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
Groups
-
USO25D-VSocionom (YH), h25, dagstudier, Vasa
Small groups
- Grupp 1
- Grupp 2
- Grupp 3
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Location and time
Lectures on campus
Materials
Material directed by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures on communication, searching for information, source criticism, academic writing and techniques for presenting.
Discussions, exercises and assignments.
Exam schedules
Presentation (0-5), essay (0-5) and other assignments (pass/fail).
Student workload
3 x 27h = 81h
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Inadequate competencies and uncompleted/failed assignments.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Superficial competencies and a basic understanding of the subject. The student has partly followed instructions.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Adequate competencies and the ability to make connections to the literature. The student is able to reflect on their views and explain their reasoning. The student has followed the instructions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student demonstrates advanced competencies and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to their future profession. The student has followed the instructions and completed the assignments well.
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage