Study Guide

Objective

Students
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- has knowledge of and can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in patient care
- can integrate patient safety and quality assurance in healthcare
- can evaluate the quality of care
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Content

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Patient safety

Location and time

Radiation safety:
2-3/2022

Materials

Radiation safety:
According to lecturer

Teaching methods

Radiation safety:
Lectures
On-line examination

Exam schedules

Radiation safety: On-line examination, march 2022

Student workload

Radiation safety: 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Radiation safety:
Max 100p, 60% for approved result, grade scale 1-5

Qualifications

None