Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can, under supervision and gradually independently, in collaboration with another student or student group, conduct a degree project at the Bachelor level (YH)
- can assess aspects of research ethics in their thesis work
- can analyze the data in his thesis

Content

The research process

Location and time

According to the list sent to students
The seminar is held at Alere if possible due to the coronasituation, otherwise online

Materials

According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice

Teaching methods

Presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

The seminar is held in December

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

-

Student workload

The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

Content scheduling

-

Further information

-

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun

Qualifications

Thesis 1