Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of neonatal care
- can predict, identify and intervene in the case of abnormalities in the newborn
- mastered follow-up and care of sick newborns
- can provide support, advice and guidance for parents with sick newborns

Content

Neonatal care

Location and time

Virtual lectures in January 2022.

Materials

Literature according to the lecturer's instructions
Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
Handouts

Teaching methods

Lectures
Demonstrations
Case
Videos

Completion alternatives

Home-examination
Completed web course and passed knowledge test: https://neohlrutbildning.se/index.php

Student workload

1 cr = 27h

Further information

The course is held by part-time teacher Pernilla Lindberg

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

BM22BK03 Antenatal Midwifery
BM22BK04 Intrapartum Care 1
BM22BK06 Postpartum Care and Breastfeeding Counselling