Study Guide

Objective

The student:
Is able to account for an ethical leadership and knows how to analyze, critically evaluate and develop her/his personal leadership
Has the ability to analyze, apply and combine modern theories of leadership - health promoting, transformative, resource strengthening, positive and shared leadership - within a sustainable transformational leadership
Is able to recognize a well-functioning and healthy community and has the ability to analyze, apply and plan methods for development of responsible leadership and a collaborative working environment
Has the ability to relate to and function according to gender and generational awareness in leadership

Content

Personal leadership
Ethically conscious leadership
Gender and generation conscious leadership
Health-promoting leadership in both a leadership and employee perspective
Working communities and social development
Modern transformative leadership theories

Location and time

23.11-31.12.2020, Turku and Vaasa (online course).

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

Self-study and written assignments/exercises.

Exam schedules

The course can be taken between 23.11-31.12.2020.

Student workload

5 ECTS credits, self-study 135 h.

Further information

More information in the Moodle.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can explain the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

The written assignments/exercises will be graded and based on these the course will be graded between 0-5

Qualifications

No prerequisites