Hoppa till innehåll

Professional SwedishPoäng (1 sp)

Kod: NU21IA06

Poäng

1 op

Studieperiodens (kursens) lärandemål

The student is has oral and written skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

Studieperiodens (kursens) innehåll

Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
difficulties. Arranges in regular care speech situations and can write simple
coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

Förkunskapskrav

No prior prerequisite

Bedömningskriterier, tillräcklig (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Anmälningstid

20.11.2023 - 30.03.2024

Tajmning

01.04.2024 - 17.11.2024

Antal studiepoäng

1 op

Prestationssätt

Kontaktundervisning

Ansvarig enhet

Institutionen för hälsa och välfärd

Undervisningsspråk
  • Englanti
Utbildning
  • Nursing
Lärare
  • Anita Kvist
  • Anna Korhonen
Lärare

Anita Kvist

Grupper
  • NU21D-V
    Nursing, full time studies 2021, Vasa

Lärandemål

The student is has oral and written skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

Innehåll

Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
difficulties. Arranges in regular care speech situations and can write simple
coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Förkunskapskrav

No prior prerequisite