Evidence-based Nursing Care and InteractionLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: VÅ26GV01
Credits
5 op
Objective
The Student:
- can apply evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a foundation for nursing care and care giving in clinical practice
- can apply the nursing process (assess, plan, implement, and evaluate care) in care work, and the Finnish classification system of care work
- can interact with clients/patients and their relatives in various situations
- has the ability for professional interaction in interprofessional teams
- understand the concept of global competence and its significance in today's world
- can reflect on cultural and global perspectives
- understands and can reflect on the ethical values, ethical guidelines, and profession-specific ethical codes of healthcare, and can act based on these in their future profession
- can explain the organization of social and healthcare in Finland
- has knowledge of social and healthcare legislation
Content
Evidence-based nursing care
Nursing process and FinCC
Professional interaction and communication
Interprofessional work
Global and cultural competence and globalization
Ethics in nursing care
Client/patient participation, self-determination, and autonomy
Social and healthcare legislation, organization, and administrative structure
Qualifications
No prior requisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.
Assessment criteria for written work.
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views.
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.