Study Guide

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
- can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
- have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
- has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
- has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
- can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

Content

Preoperative and postoperative care
Anesthesiological care
Intraoperative care

Location and time

Spring 2025
YH Novia, Vasa, Alere

Materials

PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
Terveysportti
Kumlien, C., Rystedt, J., & Almquist, M. (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

Exam schedules

Individual tasks and exercises.
Clinical examination
Moodle online tent.

Completion alternatives

Individual tasks and exercises.
Clinical examination
Moodle online tent.

Student workload

3 cr = 81 h
Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
Study on your own
ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
8+8 h practical in operation room
Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

Further information

Mandatory attendance at exercises
Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
See Moodle for more detailed information!

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care