Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has ability to meet and take care of patients in all ages, with any cultural background in her/his own context
-can handle different kind of patient situations and has the ability to guide the patient
- have knowledge of welfare technology solutions and the use of AI in clinical radiography

Content

- Geriatric
- Pediatric
- Social psychology
- Cultural competence
- Pedagogy
- Welfare technology
- AI
- Sustainable Development

Location and time

Spring term 2024
Introduction to course is online, 3 cp self-studies

Materials

Literature is presented in Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures
Problem solving
Self studies
Individual work
Groupwork

Exam schedules

The course is examined through smaller written assignments/group work. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.
Written Examination 7.5.2024
Retake 24.5, 13.9

Student workload

1 cr = 27 h
7 cr = 189 h

Further information

Mandatory attendance at lessons in workshops and seminars

In this course Moodle is the platform where al the material is.

Verval or written feedback

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Socialpsycology (u/gk)
Geriatric 2 cr (0-5)
Multicultural work 1,3 cr (0-5)
Pediatric 1,5 cr
Nursing Pedagogy 0,5
Health Technology and AI 1 cr

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam (1-2)
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam  (3-4)
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam (5)
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None