Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
- has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
- can use caring science as a basis for caring
- According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
- can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
- can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
- can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
- has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
- has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

Content

Cardiovascular disorders

Qualifications

No prior knowledge

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.