Communication for Bachelors of Social ServicesLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: SOV22SPR01
Credits
3 op
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Materials
Material directed by the lecturer
Enrollment
02.07.2025 - 31.07.2025
Timing
01.09.2025 - 19.10.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Miranda Ekholm
Teacher in charge
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Scheduling groups
- Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 3 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
Groups
-
USO25D-VSocionom (YH), h25, dagstudier, Vasa
Small groups
- Grupp 1
- Grupp 2
- Grupp 3
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Location and time
Lectures on campus
Materials
Material directed by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures on communication, searching for information, source criticism, academic writing and techniques for presenting.
Discussions, exercises and assignments.
Exam schedules
Presentation (0-5), essay (0-5) and other assignments (pass/fail).
Student workload
3 x 27h = 81h
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Inadequate competencies and uncompleted/failed assignments.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Superficial competencies and a basic understanding of the subject. The student has partly followed instructions.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Adequate competencies and the ability to make connections to the literature. The student is able to reflect on their views and explain their reasoning. The student has followed the instructions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student demonstrates advanced competencies and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to their future profession. The student has followed the instructions and completed the assignments well.
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage
Enrollment
15.06.2024 - 30.09.2024
Timing
01.10.2024 - 17.11.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Miranda Ekholm
Teacher in charge
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Groups
-
USO24D-VSocionom (YH), h24, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Location and time
Hösten 2024
Materials
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Teaching methods
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Employer connections
-
Exam schedules
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
International connections
-
Completion alternatives
-oral presentation
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Student workload
3 x 27 h = 81 hours.
Content scheduling
-
Further information
-
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment methods and criteria
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Assessment criteria for written assignments
The student has followed instructions but his/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student shows limited knowledge of the subject, he/she knows only the most essential matters.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. His/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student demonstrates good subject knowledge in his/her written assignment but the implementation is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows great knowledge of the subject. He/she has read the other participants' written assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical accuracy, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage
Enrollment
15.06.2024 - 30.09.2024
Timing
01.09.2024 - 31.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Miranda Ekholm
Teacher in charge
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Groups
-
USO24F-VSocionom (YH), h24, flerformstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Location and time
Hösten 2024
Materials
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Teaching methods
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Employer connections
-
Exam schedules
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
International connections
-
Completion alternatives
-oral presentation
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Student workload
3 x 27 h = 81 hours.
Content scheduling
-
Further information
-
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment methods and criteria
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Assessment criteria for written assignments
The student has followed instructions but his/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student shows limited knowledge of the subject, he/she knows only the most essential matters.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. His/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student demonstrates good subject knowledge in his/her written assignment but the implementation is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows great knowledge of the subject. He/she has read the other participants' written assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical accuracy, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage
Enrollment
15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 15.10.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Teacher in charge
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Groups
-
USO23D-VSocionom (YH), h23, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Location and time
Hösten 2023
Materials
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Teaching methods
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Employer connections
-
Exam schedules
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
International connections
-
Completion alternatives
-oral presentation
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Student workload
3 x 27 h = 81 hours.
Content scheduling
-
Further information
-
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment methods and criteria
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Assessment criteria for written assignments
The student has followed instructions but his/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student shows limited knowledge of the subject, he/she knows only the most essential matters.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. His/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student demonstrates good subject knowledge in his/her written assignment but the implementation is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows great knowledge of the subject. He/she has read the other participants' written assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical accuracy, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 31.12.2023
Timing
02.01.2023 - 31.03.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Tanja Myntti
Teacher in charge
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Groups
-
ÖH22REGSMPED-VÖppna yh, regionalt till socionom inom småbarnspedagogik, 120sp
Objective
Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout
Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately
Content
Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation
Location and time
Spring 2023
Materials
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Teaching methods
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Employer connections
-
Exam schedules
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
International connections
-
Completion alternatives
-oral presentation (video recorded)
-written analysis based on the oral presentation
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Student workload
3 x 27 h = 81 hours.
Content scheduling
-
Further information
-
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment methods and criteria
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Assessment criteria for written assignments
The student has followed instructions but his/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student shows limited knowledge of the subject, he/she knows only the most essential matters.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. His/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student demonstrates good subject knowledge in his/her written assignment but the implementation is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows great knowledge of the subject. He/she has read the other participants' written assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical accuracy, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
Qualifications
Graduation from the second stage