Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
- has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
- can use caring science as a basis for caring
- According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
- can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
- can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
- has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
- have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

Content

Neurology
Hematology

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Spring 2023

Materials

Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kapitel 4, 5 & 6.

Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022) (Alternativ upplaga från 2018) Omvårdnad och medicin. Kapitel: 8, 9 & 21.

Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
Kapitel 10. Neurokirurgi – skallskada och ryggmärgsskada (alt. 2012 upplaga)

Stubberud D-G., Grønset R. & Almås H. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber. Kapitel 23-25 (alt. 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)

Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.

Referenslitteratur:
Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self-studies
Teamwork

Exam schedules

According to schedule

Completion alternatives

Written exam
Written assignment

Student workload

27 h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam: 0-5
Written assignment: 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 50%

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: points 70%-89%

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

Qualifications

No prior knowledge