Study Guide

Objective

The student
- masters methods to support and monitor the child’s growth and development
- recognizes and can intervene at an early stage in situations that may pose a risk to the child’s health and development
- has knowledge of relationships, parenting and early interaction
- is prepared to provide guidance and counselling to the family on issues regarding upbringing and health habits
- can respect the cultural affiliation of the child and its family
- can work within various networks and teams to support the child and its family
- masters the vaccination program offered at the child welfare clinic

Content

Couple relationship, parenting, early interaction
Methods to support and monitor the child's growth and development
Recurrent and comprehensive health examinations, screenings
Early intervention and recognition of situations that may pose a risk to the child's health and development including child protection
Supervision and counseling for the family in education issues and issues related to health habits
Multi-professional and multicultural health care work
Vaccination activities in child health clinics

Location and time

Autumn 2024 week 36-41

Materials

För study material : see also Moodle
Kurslitteratur:
NEUKO databas - lastenneuvola via THL/terveysportti, 2022
Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen och inom skolhälsovården - Metodhandbok 31/2018. THL ( elektronisk) Mäki P.Wikström K., Hakulinen-Viitanen T., Laatikainen T
Institutet för hälsa och välfärd. www.thl.fi Webbsidan : Infektionssjukdomar och Vaccinationer
Tillsammans kring matbordet-kostrekommendationer för barnfamiljer. THL. förnyad upplaga 2019

Referenslitteratur ( barnhälsovård ) :
Barnhälsovård-att främja barns hälsa . 2016. red. Magnusson, Blennow, Hagelin, Sundelin. Liber:Stockholm
Barnrådgivningen som stöd för barnfamiljer. Handbok för personalen.
Handböcker 2005:12. Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
Bramhagen, A-C. och Carlsson, A. (red.) Hälsofrämjande arbete för barn och ungdomar. 2013. Studentlitteratur
Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto. Tunnista vauvan hätä! Vauvan kaltoinkohtelun tunnistaminen ja siihen puuttuminen
Hakulinen-Viitanen, Hietanen-Peltola, Hastrup, Wallin ja Pelkonen
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2008:24. Isien ja isyyden tukeminen äitiys- ja lastenneuvoloissa.
Halme, N. 2009. Isän ja leikki-ikäisen lapsen yhdessäolo. THL.
Kirjaamisopas: Lastenneuvola ja kouluterveydenhuolto. THL.2022
Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY
Laaja terveystarkastus. Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon. Opas 22/2012. THL
Mothander-Risholm P; Broberg;A. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar I vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
MLL. Hur växer och utvecklas barn.
Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2010:7. Älä lyö lasta! Kansallinen lapsiin kohdistuvan kuritusväkivallan vähentämisen toimintaohjelma 2010-2015
Salpa, P. 2007. Lapsen liikkumisen kehitys, ensimmäinen ikävuosi. Tammi.
Silven, M. (toim.Ahonen, L. 2017. Haastavat kasvatustilanteet. Lämpimän vuorovaikutuksen käsikirja. Juva: PS-Kustannus.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, simulations,
Own work in base groups

Exam schedules

Exam 11.10
Reexam 1 22.11.2024
Reexam 2 17.1.2025

Student workload

Students' work effort is expected to correspond to 27 hours per credit

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the start of the course, demonstrations, simulations and expert lectures

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved exam, grade 1-5
Approved participation in simulations
Deltagit i expertföreläsning

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Failed exam
Not participated in simulations
Not participated in expert lecture

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Introduction to public health nursing