Study Guide

Objective

Student
- understand the operating principles of X-ray tubes and generator, the origin of X-rays and have thorough insights into imaging techniques and the use of X-ray apparatus for conventional examinations
- has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
- conducts basic projection learning and can be the basic principles for planning, performing and evaluating nativity studies
- has basic knowledge of pathological findings.
- has basic knowledge of ultrasound technology and is familiar with various surveys; preparation, implementation and aftercare.
- has good insights into different types of X-ray equipment for examining the theet and jaws.
- can apply an aseptic way of working and have knowledge of infectious diseases and insulation principles
- understands the importance of good patient experience and safe patient care
- can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

Content

-x-ray tubes and generators
-imaging techniques for conventinal examinations
-anatomy
-basics in projection learning and criteria for good x-ray examination
-Ultrasound
-x-rays of theeth
-Aseptic and infectious diseases
-Ethics

Location and time

During autumn 24 and spring 25

Materials

Companies, pp presentations, see Moodle
Radiology (2022) L. Blomqvist and S. Zackrisson.
Patient care in radiography: with an introduction to medical imaging. (2017) Ehrlich, Ruth Ann, author ; Coakes, Dawn M., author. Elsevier, Ninth edition
Radiography of children : a guide to good practice (2004) Hardwick, Judith ; Gold, Catherine. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone
HUS-Hyvän kuvan kriteritit
Regulations
Recommendations
Current research
Websites

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical exercises, discussion

Exam schedules

Examination - according to agreement
written submissions - according to agreement
exercise tasks - according to agreement

Student workload

27 h/c

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed the exam, passed mandatory assignments and exercises
Active participation can affect course grades. According to the supervisors, absences can be supplemented

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Failed the exam, unsubmitted mandatory tasks and assignments.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students have superficial knowledge of the subject (reading by heart)

Assessment criteria for written work
Students have followed the instructions for the written work. Has deficient knowledge of the substance and is not familiar with it and has deficient knowledge of other people's written works.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students can give an account of the literature, reflect and justify their opinions

Assessment criteria for written work
Students have followed the instructions for written work and master the substance of their work, but the application is limited. Has insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written works.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students demonstrate in-depth knowledge and maturity within the subject

Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for written work and shows that she has mastered the material. Is well-read in the other participants' written works, can ask relevant questions and lead a seminar discussion. The written work and possible opposition demonstrate excellent knowledge. (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working method)

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography