Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has in-depth knowledge of sexual health and sexology
- can guide and support clients in issues related to sexual health and family planning
- has in-depth knowledge of gynecological care
- has clinical skills in gynecological care

Content

Sexual health
Gynecological care

Location and time

Autumn 2024
Novia, Alere + online

Materials

Klemetti R. & Raussi-Lehto, E. (red.), Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta – Seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014–2020, Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. Opas 33/2014.

Lindgren et al. 2022. Reproduktiv hälsa. Barnmorksans kompetensområde. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Lundgren, I, Blix, E, Gottfredsdottir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagard Nohr, E. 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Oscarsson M. & Georgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Harvala m.fl., 2021, Kätilötyö. Edita, Helsingfors.

Ryttyläinen K. & Valkama S., 2010, Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä, Edita, Helsingfors

Tapanainen,J., Heikinheimo, O.& Kaarin Mäkikallio, K. (toim.) 2019 (eller 2011). Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Duodecim. (kap. 1-17, 20-31)(kap. 2-12, 14-28 i 2011)

www.terveysportti.fi
According to instructions from the lecturers

Teaching methods

Lectures, group works, discussion, video, demonstration, practical exercises, individual work

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Validation according to general directives in Novia.
Written exam deadline see Moodle
Retake exams on two general exam days, see Moodle or Peppi

Registration on Peppi is compulsory for re take exams no later than the Monday before the exam.
In the retake Tapanainen et al. see above or equivalent literature in English + Moodle material both lectures and groups works are included.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Lectures
Compulsory attendance at practical exercises and group work
Moodle exam in class
Plan and conduct a lesson in sexual health
Active participation in discussions

Student workload

5cr=135h
lectures
practical exercises
grupparbeten
presentationer av grupparbeten

Further information

Written exam 40p
21-24=1
25-28=2
29-32=3
33-36=4
37-40=5

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Medical and surgical 1
Medical and surgical 2
Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
Mental health and psychiatry