Skip to main content

Patient and Client Safety when Social and Health Care is Digitized (3 cr)

Code: VÅV22KV13-3013

General information


Enrollment

15.06.2025 - 19.10.2025

Timing

20.10.2025 - 05.12.2025

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages

  • Svenska

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Nursing
  • Degree Programme in Midwifery
  • Degree Programme in Health Care

Teachers

  • Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
  • Heidi Kronqvist

Teacher in charge

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Groups

  • UBM24D-V
    Barnmorska (YH), h24, dagstudier, Vasa
  • UHV24D-V
    Hälsovårdare (YH), h24, dagstudier, Vasa

Objective

Student:
-can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
- knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
- knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
- can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
- can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
- reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

Content

Patient safety today and tomorrow
Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety