Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
- shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
- can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
- can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
- can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

Content

Physical assessment

Location and time

Spring 2024

Materials

Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.

Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle

Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

Teaching methods

lectures and practice

Employer connections

practical class are obligatory

Exam schedules

See Moodle

Completion alternatives

Written assignment and seminar

Student workload

1 ESTS= 27 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student did not achieve any of the criteria and participated in the practical lectures ,

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, , conduct frail case analysis, and weak analysis of the results

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable case presentation, the analysis and the results gave good knowledge about the topic

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context