Skip to main content

Intensive and Critical Nursing CareLaajuus (3 cr)

Code: VÅV21AK02

Credits

3 op

Objective

Student
- has evidence-based knowledge of intensive care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
- has readiness to care for patients in intensive care
- has readiness to care for child patients in intensive care
- shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
- can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
- in a simulated situation can be responsible for a safe drug treatment in intensive care

Content

Intensive and critical nursing care

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Enrollment

01.12.2023 - 22.01.2024

Timing

23.01.2024 - 26.05.2024

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Virtual portion

1 op

Mode of delivery

67 % Contact teaching, 33 % Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages
  • Svenska
Seats

10 - 35

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
  • Vasa - timlärare Vård
  • Anita Ståhl-Levón
  • Viktor Matintupa
  • Jannica Andtfolk
  • Carita Blomström
  • Marice Nedergård
Teacher in charge

Marice Nedergård

Groups
  • USS21F-V
    Sjukskötare (YH), h21, flerform, Vasa
  • USS21D-V
    Sjukskötare (YH), h21, dagstudier, Vasa

Objective

Student
- has evidence-based knowledge of intensive care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
- has readiness to care for patients in intensive care
- has readiness to care for child patients in intensive care
- shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
- can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
- in a simulated situation can be responsible for a safe drug treatment in intensive care

Content

Intensive and critical nursing care

Location and time

Novia, University of Applied Science, Alere, Vasa
Spring 2024

Materials

PEDIATRICS
Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. &Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
Handouts

INTENSIVE CARE ADULTS
Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Andra upplagan. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Rubertsson, S., Larsson, A., Lipcsey, M., Smekal, D. 2022. Intensivvård. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kap. 42.
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Lecture material on moodle

Gulbrandsen, T. & Stubberud, D-G. 2009. Intensivvård. Avancerad omvårdnad och behandling. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, videos, cases, problem solving.
Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises.

Exam schedules

Examination
Re exam 1
Re exam 2

Student workload

27 h/cr

Further information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context